<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 64bit Follow-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowtek.ca/roo/2008/64bit-follow-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowtek.ca/roo/2008/64bit-follow-up/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=64bit-follow-up</link>
	<description>A clever tagline should go here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roo</title>
		<link>http://lowtek.ca/roo/2008/64bit-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Roo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowtek.ca/roo/?p=203#comment-365</guid>
		<description>IBM&#039;s Java JDK for Linux is actually quite easy to find.  The google search is: http://www.google.ca/search?q=linux+ibm+jdk+download

Which should turn up the following link: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/linux/download.html

You want to download &quot;Java SE Version 6&quot; for the platform called &quot;64-bit AMD/Opteron/EM64T&quot; to get a JDK that runs on a 64bit x86 Linux with support for compressed references.

As for Scimark - this benchmark doesn&#039;t have the same recognition as those that are hosted by http://www.spec.org/.  However, looking at the Scimark results here http://math.nist.gov/cgi-bin/ScimarkSummary you will see that the top results are Sun based numbers, but a more careful look shows a nearly 1:1 correlation between CPU frequency and the score.  

The Scimark results attributed to the IBM JDK don&#039;t look &quot;way slower&quot; than those posted by the Sun JDK.  Today the results ranked 4th and 5th compare the IBM and Sun JDK both on 3.0GHz CPUs and they are neck and neck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM&#8217;s Java JDK for Linux is actually quite easy to find.  The google search is: <a href="http://www.google.ca/search?q=linux+ibm+jdk+download" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.ca/search?q=linux+ibm+jdk+download</a></p>
<p>Which should turn up the following link: <a href="http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/linux/download.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/linux/download.html</a></p>
<p>You want to download &#8220;Java SE Version 6&#8243; for the platform called &#8220;64-bit AMD/Opteron/EM64T&#8221; to get a JDK that runs on a 64bit x86 Linux with support for compressed references.</p>
<p>As for Scimark &#8211; this benchmark doesn&#8217;t have the same recognition as those that are hosted by <a href="http://www.spec.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.spec.org/</a>.  However, looking at the Scimark results here <a href="http://math.nist.gov/cgi-bin/ScimarkSummary" rel="nofollow">http://math.nist.gov/cgi-bin/ScimarkSummary</a> you will see that the top results are Sun based numbers, but a more careful look shows a nearly 1:1 correlation between CPU frequency and the score.  </p>
<p>The Scimark results attributed to the IBM JDK don&#8217;t look &#8220;way slower&#8221; than those posted by the Sun JDK.  Today the results ranked 4th and 5th compare the IBM and Sun JDK both on 3.0GHz CPUs and they are neck and neck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozoface</title>
		<link>http://lowtek.ca/roo/2008/64bit-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>bozoface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowtek.ca/roo/?p=203#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Is IBM&#039;s 64bit java available for Linux x86?   If so, it&#039;s sure not easy to find- 
was able to download the 32bit version of java6, but do not see a 64bit version in the same place.

Several years ago IBM&#039;s java was the fast one for numeric work, but Sun&#039;s java6
(64bit) is a fair amount faster than the 32bit Java6 (either IBM&#039;s or Sun&#039;s)
on the Scimark benchmark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is IBM&#8217;s 64bit java available for Linux x86?   If so, it&#8217;s sure not easy to find-<br />
was able to download the 32bit version of java6, but do not see a 64bit version in the same place.</p>
<p>Several years ago IBM&#8217;s java was the fast one for numeric work, but Sun&#8217;s java6<br />
(64bit) is a fair amount faster than the 32bit Java6 (either IBM&#8217;s or Sun&#8217;s)<br />
on the Scimark benchmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

